<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggers&#8217; buzz: Technorati to be sold?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/08/12/bloggers-buzz-technorati-to-be-sold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/08/12/bloggers-buzz-technorati-to-be-sold/</link>
	<description>exploring a little bit of everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/08/12/bloggers-buzz-technorati-to-be-sold/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 03:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/08/12/bloggers-buzz-technorati-to-be-sold/#comment-231</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My sincere hope is that Google ponies up the dough -- they have a great track record of improving the usability of existing ideas without fatiguing the user base with misguided profit motives.  Not to mention the fact that Technorati could really use a steady hand to sort out some of the possibilities inherent in the API that have as yet been poorly exploited.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sincere hope is that Google ponies up the dough &#8212; they have a great track record of improving the usability of existing ideas without fatiguing the user base with misguided profit motives.  Not to mention the fact that Technorati could really use a steady hand to sort out some of the possibilities inherent in the API that have as yet been poorly exploited.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mallory</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/08/12/bloggers-buzz-technorati-to-be-sold/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Mallory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 02:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/08/12/bloggers-buzz-technorati-to-be-sold/#comment-227</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I already laugh at your comment, Rob.  ;-)  I think a search engine for blogs sounds like a really handy thing.  I wonder, though: would it only search those which are classified as public, however the coding on that must work?  Would it only be personally coded/constructed/whatever blogs, or would blog sites be searched?  You may have answered all this in the entry, but the tech-speak makes it hard for me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Gosh, I really hate feeling less-than-informed; I know I could understand this stuff if I had sufficient time and instruction.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already laugh at your comment, Rob.  <img src='http://www.lunaradventures.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   I think a search engine for blogs sounds like a really handy thing.  I wonder, though: would it only search those which are classified as public, however the coding on that must work?  Would it only be personally coded/constructed/whatever blogs, or would blog sites be searched?  You may have answered all this in the entry, but the tech-speak makes it hard for me.</p>

<p>Gosh, I really hate feeling less-than-informed; I know I could understand this stuff if I had sufficient time and instruction.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/08/12/bloggers-buzz-technorati-to-be-sold/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/08/12/bloggers-buzz-technorati-to-be-sold/#comment-226</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I went to Technorati to test it out. It&#039;s interesting, but I&#039;m not quite convinced of the utility of a search engine that only searches blogs. Of course, somewhere down the line, people will perhaps laugh at this comment. It will probably be akin to saying, &quot;I&#039;m not sure of the utility of recording television programs.&quot; Or maybe not.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the plus side, I actually managed to pull up my own blog with a search. On the minus side, it&#039;s really, really slow. I did three searches and each time had to go away from the site for a couple of minutes to let it do its thing in the background. Maybe it&#039;s getting unusual traffic right now on account of the rumors, though.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My quarter&#039;s with yours on Google.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to Technorati to test it out. It&#8217;s interesting, but I&#8217;m not quite convinced of the utility of a search engine that only searches blogs. Of course, somewhere down the line, people will perhaps laugh at this comment. It will probably be akin to saying, &#8220;I&#8217;m not sure of the utility of recording television programs.&#8221; Or maybe not.</p>

<p>On the plus side, I actually managed to pull up my own blog with a search. On the minus side, it&#8217;s really, really slow. I did three searches and each time had to go away from the site for a couple of minutes to let it do its thing in the background. Maybe it&#8217;s getting unusual traffic right now on account of the rumors, though.</p>

<p>My quarter&#8217;s with yours on Google.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
