Lunar Adventures: exploring a little bit of everything
Blog post [Displaying post and comments]
An iPod dilemma
The setup: I have a 20gig, 3rd generation iPod. Bought it almost two years ago, and it’s on its last legs. Not much life out of a battery charge, and the screen is dimming. I bought a 2-year replacement warranty from CompUSA, though, and I took the iPod in. They said it qualifies to be replaced for $299.99 of store credit — the cost of a new 20gig iPod.
So I could get that new 20gig, color screen, 4th generation iPod. Or, I could get a brand new, super-spiffy, fresh to the world iPod nano plus $50 of store credit to use on a new case, maybe an AppleCare warranty (not as good as the old CompUSA replacement warranty, though), maybe a game or something.
Keep in mind that I’m a complete and total gadget nerd. I love new gadgets. I love being one of the first people on the block with a new gadget. And the iPod nano is one of the keen new gadgets that turns heads.
That having been said, I’d be losing 16 gigs in storage — from the 20gig iPod to the 4gig nano. On the other hand, my iPod currently only has about 2.5 gigs in use, as I tend to keep my music lists trimmed of any fat (storage is for CDs).
So what do you guys think I should do? I’m in a win-win situation, I really can’t lose here.
Mon September 19th, 2005 8:55 pm
Filed under Gadgets
6 comments
Leave a comment
Man, in your shoes, I’d get the nano in a nanosecond. What’s the difference between having 1.5 gigs of space you’re not using and 18.5 gigs of space you’re not using? You’d get the cool gizmo and have $50 left to get something else? Do it! Get the nano and Lost on DVD. Now there’s some entertainment value for you…
Sounds like you had a heck of a warranty if you can replace the thing for $299. Way to go.
The Nano is for 15 year old boys and girls who would rather have a trendy player than one which is worth the money.
Me personally, well I’d go with the bigger 20GB one. For one you don’t necessarily just have to hold music on it, so it’s not wasted space. Yet, I really like the nanos because they are flash based memory and not harddrive based, which is always a plus. I am for the solid state memory…
Rob: The warranty I did get lucky on… new AppleCare warranties aren’t nearly as good. I’m leaning toward the nano right now.
Eric: Harsh words! I like the lightweightedness of it while working out
Stephan: It’s true, but I have plenty of hard drive space. The digital photo use of the full sized nano is nice, but I always run out of camera battery power well before I run out of memory card space. And flash based is great…
http://www.thestreet.com/yahoo/tech/gamesandgadgets/10244829.html?cmve n=YAHOO&cmcat=FREE&cmite=NA
Update on Nano’s
Eric — been watching that closely. Have been a little worried about it, especially since early reports had Apple saying they wouldn’t replace the defective screens. That announcement has eased my fears a bit. But I am annoyed that Steve Jobs would show the nano in his pocket, then Apple claim that it shouldn’t be carried around in a pocket.