<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More sneakiness on TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/09/27/more-sneakiness-on-tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/09/27/more-sneakiness-on-tv/</link>
	<description>exploring a little bit of everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/09/27/more-sneakiness-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/09/27/more-sneakiness-on-tv/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Stephan: I&#039;m pumped about it... SVU has the most crazed plots ever.  I love it.  Crossing over into L&amp;O regular is a good move, too, since McCoy is more fun to watch than the lawyer on SVU.  I&#039;m glad L&amp;O is on after Lost -- I&#039;d be torn otherwise.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Eric: That&#039;s a good point... I see it a lot in some cases, like, USA will advertise for NBC, but they&#039;re owned by the same people (I think).  In those big networks all owned by the same people, there&#039;s a lot of cross pollination.  But Fox advertising for ABC?  Weird.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephan: I&#8217;m pumped about it&#8230; SVU has the most crazed plots ever.  I love it.  Crossing over into L&amp;O regular is a good move, too, since McCoy is more fun to watch than the lawyer on SVU.  I&#8217;m glad L&amp;O is on after Lost &#8212; I&#8217;d be torn otherwise.</p>

<p>Eric: That&#8217;s a good point&#8230; I see it a lot in some cases, like, USA will advertise for NBC, but they&#8217;re owned by the same people (I think).  In those big networks all owned by the same people, there&#8217;s a lot of cross pollination.  But Fox advertising for ABC?  Weird.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/09/27/more-sneakiness-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/09/27/more-sneakiness-on-tv/#comment-367</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;perhaps you&#039;ve addressed this in the past, but I was watching The Oreilley factor last night on fox news and saw an advertisement for the Boston Legal premier which airs on ABC.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since when do networks cross promote on other networks?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps you&#8217;ve addressed this in the past, but I was watching The Oreilley factor last night on fox news and saw an advertisement for the Boston Legal premier which airs on ABC.</p>

<p>Since when do networks cross promote on other networks?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan Segraves</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/09/27/more-sneakiness-on-tv/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan Segraves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/09/27/more-sneakiness-on-tv/#comment-363</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I did the same thing but it was worth it! Tonight&#039;s episode is going to be great!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did the same thing but it was worth it! Tonight&#8217;s episode is going to be great!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
