<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disney/ABC and Apple partnership the most interesting part of video iPod announcement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/10/12/disneyabc-and-apple-partnership-the-most-interesting-part-of-video-ipod-announcement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/10/12/disneyabc-and-apple-partnership-the-most-interesting-part-of-video-ipod-announcement/</link>
	<description>exploring a little bit of everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 03:54:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mallory</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/10/12/disneyabc-and-apple-partnership-the-most-interesting-part-of-video-ipod-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>Mallory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/10/12/disneyabc-and-apple-partnership-the-most-interesting-part-of-video-ipod-announcement/#comment-447</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, now that I&#039;ve seen/held/toyed with a video iPod, I think it&#039;s a superfluous product.  As Andy said when we checked it out last night, it wouldn&#039;t make sense for people who don&#039;t commute or take frequent, long plane or car trips.  Why else would you need such a tiny portable movie player, if not to kill time when your senses are free (from, say, driving)?  These video iPods are also very different from the notebook-sized DVD players; the latter have a much larger screen.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The picture is rather amazing, though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, now that I&#8217;ve seen/held/toyed with a video iPod, I think it&#8217;s a superfluous product.  As Andy said when we checked it out last night, it wouldn&#8217;t make sense for people who don&#8217;t commute or take frequent, long plane or car trips.  Why else would you need such a tiny portable movie player, if not to kill time when your senses are free (from, say, driving)?  These video iPods are also very different from the notebook-sized DVD players; the latter have a much larger screen.</p>

<p>The picture is rather amazing, though.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/10/12/disneyabc-and-apple-partnership-the-most-interesting-part-of-video-ipod-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/10/12/disneyabc-and-apple-partnership-the-most-interesting-part-of-video-ipod-announcement/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think you&#039;re overlooking video resolution when it comes to this stuff. A song from iTunes sounds good on an iPod, and better on a good stereo system. A 320x240 episode of Lost looks decent on a video iPod, but lousy on a TV, especially a large or hi-def one.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It seems like a reasonable deal for plane or train commuters who want to watch stuff on something small with a decent battery life, but if it&#039;s a choice between picking up a DVD set and a bunch of shows on iTunes, I&#039;ll go with the former.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re overlooking video resolution when it comes to this stuff. A song from iTunes sounds good on an iPod, and better on a good stereo system. A 320&#215;240 episode of Lost looks decent on a video iPod, but lousy on a TV, especially a large or hi-def one.</p>

<p>It seems like a reasonable deal for plane or train commuters who want to watch stuff on something small with a decent battery life, but if it&#8217;s a choice between picking up a DVD set and a bunch of shows on iTunes, I&#8217;ll go with the former.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/10/12/disneyabc-and-apple-partnership-the-most-interesting-part-of-video-ipod-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/10/12/disneyabc-and-apple-partnership-the-most-interesting-part-of-video-ipod-announcement/#comment-444</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;our=are...:-(&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>our=are&#8230;:-(</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/10/12/disneyabc-and-apple-partnership-the-most-interesting-part-of-video-ipod-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/10/12/disneyabc-and-apple-partnership-the-most-interesting-part-of-video-ipod-announcement/#comment-443</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m going to assume that the people who can afford and our technically savvy enough to own a Video iPod also have a Tivo or a system similar.  What&#039;s the point of downloading a tv show for 1.99 to watch on a 2 inch screen when Tivo is just as convenient?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I saw some interview with a kid explaining the benefits of the video ipod and he said &quot;now i can store 35 of my dvds and instead of bringing two binders full of movies to my friend&#039;s house i can just take my ipod.&quot;  This seems like a bit of a stretch to me....for one, how hard is it to call your friend before you come over and ask what dvd you want to watch and how many of ya&#039;ll bring your DVD collection to your friend&#039;s house in the first place?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to assume that the people who can afford and our technically savvy enough to own a Video iPod also have a Tivo or a system similar.  What&#8217;s the point of downloading a tv show for 1.99 to watch on a 2 inch screen when Tivo is just as convenient?</p>

<p>I saw some interview with a kid explaining the benefits of the video ipod and he said &#8220;now i can store 35 of my dvds and instead of bringing two binders full of movies to my friend&#8217;s house i can just take my ipod.&#8221;  This seems like a bit of a stretch to me&#8230;.for one, how hard is it to call your friend before you come over and ask what dvd you want to watch and how many of ya&#8217;ll bring your DVD collection to your friend&#8217;s house in the first place?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/10/12/disneyabc-and-apple-partnership-the-most-interesting-part-of-video-ipod-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 02:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/10/12/disneyabc-and-apple-partnership-the-most-interesting-part-of-video-ipod-announcement/#comment-441</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The full first season of Lost (25 episodes) via iTunes is $34.99; the box set of the same on Amazon is $38.99 (discounted from MSRP of $59.99.) I think $1.99/episode is roughly comparable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Similarly, if you compare $0.99/song to the cost of a CD, it&#039;s roughly comparable. A little less, depending on the circumstances, but it varies. Assuming the same cut (which may be wrong), I don&#039;t think the artists are any worse off overall under $0.99 downloads. It does &lt;em&gt;sound&lt;/em&gt; cheap, but when you compare it to the price of an album--or a DVD set-- which also factors in packaging, manufacturing, etc (things that a download doesn&#039;t have to deal with)--I don&#039;t really think that it is.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The full first season of Lost (25 episodes) via iTunes is $34.99; the box set of the same on Amazon is $38.99 (discounted from MSRP of $59.99.) I think $1.99/episode is roughly comparable.</p>

<p>Similarly, if you compare $0.99/song to the cost of a CD, it&#8217;s roughly comparable. A little less, depending on the circumstances, but it varies. Assuming the same cut (which may be wrong), I don&#8217;t think the artists are any worse off overall under $0.99 downloads. It does <em>sound</em> cheap, but when you compare it to the price of an album&#8211;or a DVD set&#8211; which also factors in packaging, manufacturing, etc (things that a download doesn&#8217;t have to deal with)&#8211;I don&#8217;t really think that it is.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mallory</title>
		<link>http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/10/12/disneyabc-and-apple-partnership-the-most-interesting-part-of-video-ipod-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Mallory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 22:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunaradventures.net/2005/10/12/disneyabc-and-apple-partnership-the-most-interesting-part-of-video-ipod-announcement/#comment-440</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I have trouble with the $1.99 price tag.  That seems awfully cheap for all the work put into the process.  I realize it&#039;s only a short show (is the price set, whether the show is half-hour or whole-hour?), but it seems to sell the product short.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Though, of course, in some shows&#039; cases, $1.99 might be a little pricey.  Hm.  I don&#039;t know.  Now I&#039;m starting to think about the $.99 price tag on iTunes for a single song.  I&#039;m glad it&#039;s not more, as a consumer, but I also feel like all of this is somewhat cheap, from the artists&#039; ends.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have trouble with the $1.99 price tag.  That seems awfully cheap for all the work put into the process.  I realize it&#8217;s only a short show (is the price set, whether the show is half-hour or whole-hour?), but it seems to sell the product short.</p>

<p>Though, of course, in some shows&#8217; cases, $1.99 might be a little pricey.  Hm.  I don&#8217;t know.  Now I&#8217;m starting to think about the $.99 price tag on iTunes for a single song.  I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s not more, as a consumer, but I also feel like all of this is somewhat cheap, from the artists&#8217; ends.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

